130
rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 2 years ago by sergio to c/196
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CoderKat@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

I'm not sure I see how that would affect the developer. The charge back would be only to the reseller, wouldn't it?

[-] sergio 5 points 2 years ago

so what I think the problem is, or how I understand it, is that the person with the stolen CC info buys keys, puts it on reseller sites, and then gets laundered money in return

But the people who had their CC info stolen obviously contact their bank, or their bank does it for them, and tells the marketplace that originally sold the keys "hey those were fraudulent transactions, we need our money back" and get some kind of refund, while the keys stay valid for whatever reason. This can have a negative impact on the developer because not only do they need to return previously made profit, but there is something about people who get X amount of chargebacks that they get penalized for, so its basically like giving the devs a fee for having their game stolen (an actual lost sale), so they lose money on two fronts.

Idk how accurate this information is, but this article basically lays it out as I understand it

When keys are either stolen or bought illegally, the developer in question is always the one who is hurt the most. For transactions that get chargeback, the developer is out the money in the transaction.

this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
130 points (100.0% liked)

196

16747 readers
2156 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS