49
Hon Hon Hon (loot.buckodr.ink)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by xusontha@ls.buckodr.ink to c/polandball@lemm.ee

Not OC

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

"Typo" is short for "typographical error." The A and E aren't close enough to excuse what's obviously a common spelling error. You don't have to lie on the Internet.

My reply was not solely about your spelling error. Your reading comprehension sucks.

[-] xusontha@ls.buckodr.ink 1 points 1 year ago

typographical error definition

You say things, but I'm not sure if you know what they mean. It was in fact a misspelling since I do know the correct spelling. Additionally, typos can occur in more than just one way, so it is still a typo. There is nothing saying a typo HAS to be because the keys are next to each other.

Also how is this comment not only about grammar:

*grammar

It wouldn't make any sense for it to be possessive.

I am not lying on the internet, nor do I feel the need to. I care about the opinions of people I know and care about, not one from a random stranger who ignores facts.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Obviously I was referring to the possessive form of baguette. Do you think somehow "grammer" would be the possessive of "grammar?" If so, your grammar is even worse than I thought. Stay in school, kid.

[-] xusontha@ls.buckodr.ink 1 points 1 year ago

What are you even saying here? You're saying words but they just don't make sense, especially in the context of what I'm talking about. Above I was saying it was a typo that I made and asking how is a comment that is only correcting a grammar mistake "not solely about your spelling error". Why do you think that I would think "grammer" is the possessive of "grammar"? I literally just said it was a typo....

You also still are ignoring what I'm saying.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Try reading my comments. Hint: I wrote them in English.

[-] xusontha@ls.buckodr.ink 1 points 1 year ago

I did go back and read them, and all I saw was you ignoring what I said and I'm still confused about what you're talking about. Since you seem to know so much more than me can you please quote exactly what you're talking about, since apparently I don't understand English (hint: I'm actually quite good at English (English skills don't involve not making typos though, just in case you were going to say that even though it would make no sense. (You seem to make points at that level though))).

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The apostrophe is unnecessary.

[-] xusontha@ls.buckodr.ink 1 points 1 year ago

It is. You aren't wrong. It's put there intentionally though, as a joke

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

No, it distracts from the joke. It just makes the author look ignorant.

[-] xusontha@ls.buckodr.ink 1 points 1 year ago

You may think that, but I (and I think most others) would disagree

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You may disagree, but I (and I think most others) would think that.

this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
49 points (100.0% liked)

polandball

154 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago