393
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Leaks confirm low takeup for Windows 11::Time to rethink Windows 10 support cycle then?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I still think 10 is a waste of space and would be using only linux or 7 if not for gamepass (old distant friends have xboxes only). I still run 7 on my living room PC and its honestly a better experience then 10. If not for end of life (that lets face it are mostly arbitrary at this point) there is little reason to upgrade, even the few things not in things 7 or 10 (like auto HDR support or new Direct X) are simply withheld for no reason and often people have worked out how make it work anyway.

I am old enough to remember how each new windows addressed a flaw in the last (even if that flaw was made up). Here is off the top of my head some examples (leaving out the better NT line) :

  • Windows 95: Upgrade from 3.1 in most ways, first time dos was really secondary.
  • Windows 98: Much better USB support and more "plug and play"
  • Windows ME: Fixed the issue of people having hard drive space.
  • Windows XP: Massive upgrade in supported hardware, usability etc.
  • Windows Vista: People thought this sucked (it did) but the main reason was that it (and x64 XP) supported more then 4 gigs of ram.
  • Windows 7: Was not Vista and much more efficient.
  • Windows 8: Fixed the perceived flaw that your PC should really be a phone for some reason?
  • Windows 9: DAMN IT MICROSOFT LEARN TO COUNT!
  • Windows 10: Was not a Phone OS. Things like gamepass are supported. Told this was the last windows.
[-] Ashe 7 points 1 year ago

Genuinely I'll give Michaelsoft credit on skipping 9, they did that to avoid SEO poisoning windows 9x variants.

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

What? if that was a good enough reason to skip 9 they could have called it something else. What happened was that marketing said 10 is cooler.

[-] rooster_butt@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

The did name it something else. They named it 10. A lot of programs had checks for windows version looking for 9 for 95/98 which would cause issues without updates. So it's better to avoid it altogether.

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

That's an urban myth. Programs check for the internal windows version major and minor number which doesn't resemble the official name in any way. The version for Windows 9x was version 4 and the version for Windows 9 (if it existed) would have been 7.

load more comments (14 replies)
this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
393 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59612 readers
2862 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS