1442
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Waldemar_Firehammer@sh.itjust.works to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Disney is raking its customers over the coals with a 75% price hike for their annual subscription (originally $80.) People wonder why piracy is on the rise.Multiple commenters are saying I'm off base about the 75% price increase. My payment less than a year ago was $79.99. Here's the proof.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

I love how $12/month is somehow "raking customers over the coals"

[-] jeremy_sylvis@midwest.social 71 points 1 year ago

Well, when the price increases by ~75% and the value does not increase by ~75%, this sentiment isn't exactly surprising.

[-] synceDD@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe 75% down was never sustainable and they wanted to build a userbase? Try to think buddy

[-] jeremy_sylvis@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

Like about how that... doesn't actually change anything that was said?

[-] synceDD@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Don't worry about it, disney bad 😁

[-] Surdon@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe the question should be why the service was only just worth it at 75% down then

[-] synceDD@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Why is that a question dont like it dont buy it

[-] Surdon@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

We aren't. That's what we said- the value proposition isn't there

[-] CassowaryTom@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, it is a lot of stuff. If you have seen it all and you ate waiting for Pixar or marvel to crank one out then... wait. Dont re-up for a year.

[-] jeremy_sylvis@midwest.social 25 points 1 year ago

Right, so anyone adopting such a "buy for a month and binge watch" strategy can still pay ~75% more and not receive a ~75% increase in value.

Nothing is changed.

[-] CassowaryTom@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago

Oh my god, I didnt even realize where I was. No wonder nobody is on my side. Godspeed, pirates, and thankyou for your service.

[-] CassowaryTom@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Well no, im assuming most people subscribing to Disney know what they are getting. Mostly old stuff with some new series based on their properties. I liked Loki, bit that isnt the point. My point is you as the consumer have the right to tell Disney to fuck right off and if enough people do it, they will compromise and you still wont be happy because that is what compromise feels like. Personally, I still havent seen all of the Marvel movies yet.

[-] online@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Does the service have non-superhero and non-animated-family-movies content? The name "Disney" puts me off, because I an not into superheroes and I don't have a family so I don't really watch animated family musicals.

[-] CassowaryTom@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, they have a ton of stuff like that. Im not a Disney spokesman even though I sound like one in this thread. I think its a shitty company if im honest. If you are looking for a TV babysitter you could do worse., though

[-] CassowaryTom@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

I think I misunderstood your position. Here is mine. Disney wont provide stimulating entertainment for many grown people. ThATS it. Im done talking about it forever.

load more comments (12 replies)
this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
1442 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54609 readers
315 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS