706

submitted 1 year ago by Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to c/196

32 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, it's a consent thing. Not really for you to decide that, eh? I for one would be totally down to eat some leg if it got amputated because of an accident or something, and I would absolutely ask to keep my own leg for that purpose (not that I would tell the doctor) if one of mine were ever amputated.

More on topic, I would absolutely donate blood to vampires if they were real

[-] Commiunism@lemmy.wtf 10 points 1 year ago

Vampires are actually real though, there are some companies in the US that sell young peoples' blood they bought from blood banks to rich people as blood transfusions.

Now it makes sense why most classic depictions of vampires present them as rich people in their own castles.

[-] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe 17 points 1 year ago

That's because vampires have always been a metaphor for the rich exploiting and leeching off of the poor.

[-] spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Somehow this had never occurred to me...

[-] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 year ago

One of my friends in my college days explained it to me. They specifically choose poor people to feed off of, rarely ever high society, and that's how royalty and feudal lords would act back in the day too. Some of the IRL ruling class would even bathe in young women's blood.

And vampires are almost always rich in fiction.

And we all know how the rich treat the poor in real life.