18
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
18 points (100.0% liked)
SteamDeck
21 readers
1 users here now
A place dedicated to all things Steam Deck: news, discussion, photos, questions, memes, etc. Links:
- SteamDeck.com
- OnDeck - Official Steam Deck Twitter
- Steam Deck OLED - Starting at $549
- Steam Deck FAQ
- ProtonDB
- Overkill.wtf
- Steam Deck HQ
- DeckMate.me
- GamingonLinux
- Great on Deck
founded 1 year ago
That is certainly a good point, and someone on the Steam Deck subreddit had a few things to say about that. I'd definitely say proceed with caution and not be too liberal in its use maybe. No one's been using this for very long at all, so nothing's off the table. Only time will tell.
Maybe use it in select games and not all the time. Besides, the way I understood it, 70Hz is only applied once in-game and if explicitly set, so it's not applicable when no game is running - though I'm not 100% on that.
Even so, the reduction in lifespan may be negligible for all we know, and right now it probably is just a matter if one thinks the potential tradeoff is worth it. I am using it now only in select games, but these are games that I play for extended periods, however being that I am quite sensitive to the flicker at 60Hz, the 17% increase does a lot to mitigate feelings of unease for me. So personally, right now, I'd say it's worth it. If the screen dies a bit prematurely, I'd probably bite the bullet and buy a new screen, and give a try at one of those full shell replacements.