383
C Compilers be like
(lemmy.ml)
Used all of these three. I don't want to even look at MS Visual C/C++ ecosystem.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
383 points (100.0% liked)
Programmer Humor
32571 readers
248 users here now
Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)
Rules:
- Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
- No NSFW content.
- Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Why are clang and gcc the wrong way around?
I'm a gcc user partly because of the optimization. I mean it's a pretty small difference. But still for scientific stuff gcc is slightly better I think. There's not much difference though and it basically comes to personal preference.
I am in full agreement. My comment was purely for spiciness. How dare you respond with rational and agreeable points. Good day sir!
every day i become less and less sure that i actually left reddit
What if Reddit was just the friends we made along the way?
For not that performance intensive stuff I would use clang though.
I haven't dealt with HPC in a while, but Intel C compiler against MKL libraries were fastest CPU, and Nvidia CUDA was slightly easier to develop than OpenCL for other cards. I'm not sure if the situation's changed.
For my current applications, I use NumPy compiled against Intel MKV installed as a binary. It works great.
A fair and proportionate response.
Ow my eyes
I will give you an upvote instead of the other guy since he stole your idea.
Is it any different from the standard
decltype?