1020
Windows 12 May Require a Subscription
(www.pcmag.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
1020 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
59640 readers
2380 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
So the year of the Linux desktop is finally happening
Someone build active directory and domain join all the PC so that organizations can replace Microsoft .
There are many AD alternatives already, like Zentyal and FreeIPA or even Samba. But you'll never see any existing organization (certainly not medium or large ones) making a switch to a complete Linux environment, because then you'll have to deal with users - and no one wants to deal with users. I remember when back in the day our old company tried to roll out Office 2007 with the new ribbon interface - there was such a strong resistance from users that we had to cancel the rollout halfway and downgrade them back to Office 2003. Now imagine the kind of hell that would break out if you were to suddenly replace Windows with Linux...
It's an interesting thing when companies will gladly take all routes possible to make their employees miserable just to pinch a few extra coins of profit out but when a truly money saving action is available it will not be rolled out because of "fear" of people complaining about minor details.
IT changes usually affect management as well, while "cost saving" in production doesn't.
Again, interesting how real cost saving solutions are never implemented.
Because it's not a real cost savings when everything is figured in...like hiring/training help desk staff to support Linux, or management signing off on risks (or even spending the project time on quantifying those risks).
Enterprise IT is far more complex than most people realize. Sometimes the upfront cost difference is quickly lost in a sea of predictable (or unpredictable) down-stream costs.
Above all, pushing changes with unknown/unvetted risks will be met with a lot of resistance - because risk usually comes with hard to predict costs, in IT terms and in downtime, lost productivity, exposure to legal issues, etc.
Just say its for security and privacy reasons and make these users sign a statement saying if they won't agree then they will be held responsible for any breach or hack and see how easily it gets deployed. End of the day it all comes down to the decision makers and most of them in IT are spineless bunch because I think most of their life they have spent time doing customer service.
When someone says this, it's a recurring joke, but when I've read your comment, it's the first time I actually think it may happen.
Well, I don't expect a takeover at all, but perhaps I envision something like this year's Reddit migration: I imagine some individuals or companies won't stand for it and switch to Linux.
So maybe in one year Linux on desktop will go from 2% global installations, to 3% or 4% which would be a colossal uptake!
(I admit I've not checked the current percentage of Linux installations, it was 2% years ago, but maybe it's already higher)
According to this post, 2016 was the year of the Linux desktop. ... But yeah, we're on about 3%.
First time I heard it was about 1998...