847
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 132 points 1 year ago

I see angry wankers want to moan for the sake of moaning.

Eliminating smoking is a goos thing! I'll take my wins whenever possible, doesn't happen all that often.

[-] evatronic@lemm.ee 47 points 1 year ago

But but there are other things that are also bad and if one proposal doesn't solve everything it is complete trash!!!

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 year ago

Yea not everything is a partisan issue, and this seems like a good thing? Antismoking efforts have largely been successful in a lot of places.

It's not one of those things where someone is choosing to harm themselves only. Smoking affects the people around you

[-] ThePenitentOne@discuss.online 17 points 1 year ago

So many people like to portray everything as a 'personal choice' while ignoring all said implications to others. Very rarely does something only actually impact you.

[-] 000999@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 year ago

First and foremost, people have the right to slowly kill themselves with cigarettes as long as it isn't harming innocent bystanders.

Arguably more importantly, the proposed ban is worryingly dystopian.

Finally, agreeing with anything Sunak does is unforgivable. And in this case would reflect neo-liberal sympathies.

[-] Alto@kbin.social 46 points 1 year ago

as long as it isn’t harming innocent bystanders.

Considering that's exactly what second hand smoke does, I really don't see what point you're trying to make.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Except it doesn't, less than 9% of the population in the USA uses tobacco in any form, including in that group is past smokers and vapers so it's probably around 7% or less. Continually attacking a vice that's basically done is just virtue signaling bullshit. Alcoholism has skyrocketed and kills way more people a year, and obesity is now our number one killer by miles. No one is dying from second hand smoke...you sitting in traffic is doing way more damage to your body than getting a random breeze of smoke from someone outside.

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago

What they are trying to say is to ban it in public areas, but not at home.

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

But consumption isn't being banned...

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 36 points 1 year ago

Except smokers always insist on slowly murdering everyone around them and littering everything in their path. If you want to smoke in a hermetically sealed room and not get close to me for at least 6 hours after, fine by me.

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 year ago

First and foremost, people have the right to slowly kill themselves with cigarettes as long as it isn't harming innocent bystanders.

That's the thing with smoking though, second hand smoke is a big problem, especially for vulnerable people

[-] mriormro@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They're literally cancer sticks...

I guess we should allow people to sell antifreeze as both an industrial chemical and a soft drink. Arguably, people have the right to quickly and painfully kill themselves as well.

[-] 000999@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 year ago

Humans have been smoking tobacco for thousands of years. Banning it will only allow the black market to swell to an unimaginable size

[-] mriormro@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

These are cigarettes. Engineered to be as addictive as possible. We aren't talking about hand rolled stogies here

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

By that logic we should continue slavery. Aren't you worried someone's going to purchase one of your children on the black market!?

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago

Slaves don't grow on trees though

[-] 000999@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

Moving the goalposts or something like that?

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You can imagine it, it would be less than the amount that is currently being smoked.

[-] 000999@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

Not necessarily. People could actually start smoking more because tax free cigarettes are astronomically cheaper

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Are people smoking less weed now it's legal in many US states?

Where do you think tax free cigarettes are going to come from?

[-] 000999@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

They are either domestic bootlegs or imports. If cigarettes were actually fully banned, organized crime groups would begin mass cigarette smuggling and manufacturing operations. Sounds ridiculous, but it's true

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

People don't enjoy or need smoking that much, so no.

And my first question?

[-] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

It’s gobsmacking what people will argue for. Shines a light in the general dimness of people.

[-] kshade@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Banning it for everyone is OK, telling some people that they can't ever because they were born too late is silly, discriminatory and will inevitably create a flourishing black market.

this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
847 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2042 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS