ok here's my argument: most homeless people aren't like you describe, these kinds of programs benefit the vast majority and the tolerance of failure lies within expected bounds to believe the program is an overwhelming success (as evinced by the links above).

Although I fail to see how that couldn't have just been taken as read by any sensible reader.

You don't know how peer reviewed science works, and aren't worth talking to.

The fact that you think that providing housing doesn't work, when we have multiple countries worldwide that prove it does, just goes to show that you are a selfish bigot that doesn't want to solve the problem.