529
submitted 2 years ago by 0x815@feddit.de to c/europe@feddit.de

Just 1% of people are responsible for half of all toxic emissions from flying.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Don_alForno@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

Fossil fueled cars aren't going to get that much more efficient in the foreseeable future, especially since manufacturers know they are a dead horse.

So what do you propose for that sector? Banning driving? And that's then easier than banning private flying, despite far more people relying on it every day, it being far more decentralized and far harder to regulate for that reason? Globally, at that? I mean of course we should improve public transit to make it a better alternative, but that's an equally monumental task that will take decades in most places.

Air travel is definitely a lower hanging fruit as for the majority of people it's a luxury, not a necessity.

[-] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

You do know that electric cars exist, right? Replacing gas powered cars, trucks, and semis would have a far more significant impact with less inconvenience and change required than it would to ban commercial air travel even partially. You say it’s a luxury but companies, families, and governments rely on it.

this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
529 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

8332 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS