529
submitted 2 years ago by 0x815@feddit.de to c/europe@feddit.de

Just 1% of people are responsible for half of all toxic emissions from flying.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SHITPOSTING_ACCOUNT@feddit.de 11 points 2 years ago

Or just a rate sufficient to remove and sequester 2x the amount.

Or require them to use 100% sustainable fuel to accelerate the development of such fuels.

[-] twopi@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 years ago

Carbon sequestration is not possible right now or even for the foreseeable future.

Forcing jets to use renewable resources is a good one be should aim to ban private short and medium haul flights in general.

[-] muix@infosec.pub 2 points 2 years ago

Are trees not sufficient for carbon sequestration?

[-] sonori@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago

In order to actually sequester carbon from trees you then need to cut them down and use or burry the lumber in a place where it will rest for the rest of time. Besides we would need vastly more space, water, and firefighting to even approach real offsets. Trees are nice for shade and some ecosystems but they don’t really have anything to do with climate change beyond burning up faster.

this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
529 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

8332 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS