359
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ShortFuse@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's a strawman. I don't need 1000s of lines of JS to swap a UI. I can do it in 1 line with Web Components: oldElement.replaceWith(newElement). And those modules can be lazy loaded like anything else.

This is just DX in name of UX, which is almost never a good idea.

And maybe you're fine with throwing a server computation for every single UI change, but I'm not made of money and I much rather have stuff on a CDN.

[-] soeren@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 1 year ago

I think i missunderstood you I thought you were arguing for modern web frameworks. Nothing wrong with replacing elments with js and not sending it as a request to a server I would do the same for stuff that doesn't need data from the server. If you are really worried about latency you could throw your code in a cloudflare worker but I don't think it matters that much average loading time of websites on desktop is 2.5 seconds . So it doesn't really matter if the server is on the other site of the world latency will not be the biggest factor.

this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
359 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

32456 readers
728 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS