836
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

"Raytheon never deactivated their missiles, they just don't work over the target."

That's deactivating them dummy. Where do you think Ukraine is going with their Starlinks? Disneyland?

[-] Zengen@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Missiles and satellite arrays have no similarities in the way they technologically function. So this argument doesn't actually hold any water. Elon musk is the operator of the starlink. Ukraine does not operate starlink satellites. Ukraine operates the missiles we GIVE to them. Meaning the baton of ownership has been passed off from the united states to Ukraine. The Ukrainian operators then have the autonomy to do with that as they see fit. This is why we give Ukraine guns and bullets but we dont give them the human soldier to fire them. Because this implicates direct US involvement in an offensive strike against Russia. In June 2023 starlink won contract with the pentagon. Meaning elon musk and starlink are acting as agents of the united states government and as such as bound by very similar rules of engagement that the normal US military is. The difference between giving them missiles and starlink is that we can't just say "here are your very own satellites that you have the keys and drivers wheel to and they belong to you now"

[-] bezerker03@lemmy.bezzie.world 3 points 2 years ago

Over Ukrainian territory. For defensive purposes. Where it was originally agreed for. Crimea hasn't been Ukraine for years (even though it should be). Offensives into Russia were not part of any operational original deals.

It's not deactivating if it was never live there.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 22 points 2 years ago

The individual base station (or whatever) has its service deactivated when it goes to Crimea, which is internationally recognized as Ukrainian territory.

No one but Russian bootlickers think Crimea is part of Russia.

[-] bezerker03@lemmy.bezzie.world 3 points 2 years ago

Right. The individual base stations always have had a service region. It's why I can't use starlink over international waters and the same thing happens from a fishing boat or anything. There's no purposeful deactivations. Just boundaries of service already established.

It's literally part of the service when you sign up.

You're right that technically he could provide coverage anywhere in the world. There's lots of reasons he doesn't. But that's always been part of the service.

18 UNcountries recognize it as Russian territory. Some of them large superpowers or economic hubs. Including one that's expected to launch starlink soon. (Though all generally shitty countries.)

But aside from that. The rules for supplying things to Ukraine were spelled out very clearly. It's why none of the Western supplies hsve been used in Russian territory attacks. Doing so Russia claimed it would retaliate.

The articles are claiming that he intentionally turned it off when it was originally on and that's not the case. It was never active there.

[-] tym@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Look if you want to play semantics, fine. The most finite definition is that starlink satellites deactivate every time they pass over Crimea. He actively contributes to russias strike capabilities on a daily basis. It's far worse than the story, not better.

Won't matter when Ukraine creates their own capabilities, but fuck musk just the same.

[-] bezerker03@lemmy.bezzie.world 2 points 2 years ago

Musk is beholden to various international laws when providing this coverage. Like it or not Russia considers crimea their territory and would not respond kindly to musk allowing it's use over their territory.

Like I love how everyone just expects this dude to just as a civilian piss off a nation who can shoot his satellites down or consider it an act of war on his own.

[-] uis@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

18 UNcountries recognize it as Russian territory

Russia, Belarus, China, North Korea, Cuba, Eritrea. What are rest of 12 countries?

[-] bezerker03@lemmy.bezzie.world 3 points 2 years ago

India , and several African and middle eastern countries. (iirc Iran was on there etc). By no means a real winner list but just worth noting.

In particular India which starlink is set to go active in very soon.

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 years ago
[-] bezerker03@lemmy.bezzie.world 4 points 2 years ago

Yes. However Russia has claimed it years before this conflict and threatened retaliation if westerners interfere. It's why all of the supplies we give are only used in Ukraine. The attacks on Russian soil are not with Western supplies intentionally and this would be no different.

[-] uis@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

However Russia has claimed it years before this conflict

No, it claimed when conflict started. Just before February Putin didn't go any further.

[-] bezerker03@lemmy.bezzie.world 2 points 2 years ago

? Russia has claimed crimea since they annexed it years ago.

[-] uis@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

This is correct. Statement that Crimea was annexed before conflict started is incorrect.

[-] bezerker03@lemmy.bezzie.world 1 points 2 years ago

Maybe I'm misunderstanding please correct me. Crimea was annexed by Russia in 2014 no? The current crisis started much later than that no? (Even though technically many consider them connected for obvious reasons.)

[-] uis@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

The current crisis started much later than that no?

No, crisis wasn't ended, it was paused.

this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
836 points (100.0% liked)

World News

48998 readers
2149 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS