Nope. I don't care whether they're communist or not, they're apologists for authoritarians. The communism thing is just an excuse they dress that up in.

You said previously:

Be mindlessly propagandistic "communist." The countries they fawn over aren't even particularly communist, they're just authoritarian.

I was challenging your implied assertion that LG isn't communist, or that currently existing socialist countries aren't communist.

(For clarity, I'm using the terms "socialist", "communist" and "Marxist-leninist" mostly interchangeably. That tends to be the practice in ML spaces, I'm happy to expand on that if it's helpful).

It doesn't seem like you've got the knowledge base to argue whether or not a country like China or the DPRK is or isn't socialist. If you want to argue that they're bad because they're authoritarian, that's fine by me.

Can you help me understand what you mean by "authoritarian" and how it doesn't apply to Western/liberal democracies?

It's my understanding that every state uses authority to force some level of compliance at some expense to personal freedom (i.e. giving me a ticket for making graffiti is authoritarian).

I don't agree that every state's use of authority is a bad thing.