1422
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

I'd be curious what the population density numbers are. There's a world of difference in density between, say, single-family rowhouses and classic American suburbia.

[-] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

My math is here: https://lemmy.world/comment/3165486

But essentially, for the same cost as cars, the lowest density possible before becoming rural 106 households / sq mi (6 acres per household) can have a bus pass every 6 minutes, 24/7/365. You can double frequency by adding a second stop on the way to a transit spine.

[-] tdawg@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

The idea that an American city might have a housing area A) without roads and B) with a bus stop and C) one that shows up every 6 minutes instead of once an hour makes me want to cry

[-] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

You'd still want roads. Deliveries, emergency services, maintenance. But the roads can be just wider than a car.

Here's a north american proof of concept of a car free neighborhood: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VWDFgzAjr1k

[-] theKalash@feddit.ch 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, I think it's mostly rowhouses.

Also the entire suburb spreads along through a valley, so it's like long and thin, which makes it very easy to run a central tramline through it.

But it still should be possible anywhere with good public transport.

[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ah, there's your answer. I love rowhouses and think they and other "missing middle" are a great compromise for getting denser, more walkable, more transit-oriented communities while still avoiding being like Manhattan. True low-density sprawl (as seen in so much of the US and Canada) is detached single-family homes with large setback requirements, large parking minimums, and typically large lot size minimums. It's purposefully designed to essentially enforce car-dependent sprawl.

The style of development you describe is what we call streetcar suburbs, as they were generally developed along streetcar lines in the days of yore.

[-] theKalash@feddit.ch 4 points 1 year ago

The style of development you describe is what we call streetcar suburbs, as they were generally developed along streetcar lines in the days of yore.

Yeah, you need to build these, they are great. During the busy hours, mine is like a 150m walk away and there is tram or streetcar every 3.5 minutes. It's amazing.

this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
1422 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

10147 readers
257 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS