33

I have only commented so far with only positive reception, all my comments are in the positives and I only have 5 downvote all I am pretty sure coming from the same person on the same thread, yet I have -5 rep, why?

if I add my positive upvotes, likes, whatever and subtract my 5 downvotes I would have 97-5 which is 92, why do only downvotes or negative interaction count but not positive?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Killakomodo@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

At least we all now know, if you agree with a comment or post and want to show support boosting shows far more support then upvoting so a good rule of thumb now is if you upvote it, you should also boost it, at least for now. I hope this will be changed.

[-] QuinceDaPence@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Ernest replied above that he agrees it should be changed

[-] Killakomodo@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

yeah, I know, he replied to me, this was made before he did.

[-] asjmcguire@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Yes - it is likely down to the lack of a standard. Upvotes are federated out as the same ActivityPub schema as liking something. Boosts are federated out as boosts. So if someone on Mastodon saw your comment for example, liking it - is typically a way to say to the poster "I like this", but when you boost it you want other people to see it - so the sentiment is roughly the same here. Because if your reputation could be increased by someone on a different platform simply liking your comment - that would be fine - but there is no currently available federated ability to downvote - so people would have an artificially high reputation, because only the people on kBin platforms can downvote you. (I don't actually know if downvotes from lemmy platforms affect us here)

[-] UnshavedYak@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Seems kinda wonky. I'm working on writing my own flavor of an ActivityPub client. Is there somewhere you know of that this is being discussed, developed, etc? Iirc ActivityPub itself doesn't define this, right? I figure what we're talking about here is just the data model some apps have created within the ActivityPub spec - and by keeping it consistent apps can federate with each other. I'm curious on advancement of that model to introduce new concepts and features but retain some compatibility.

[-] asjmcguire@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

ActivityPub specs are discussed and I believe extended here: https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/c/activitypub/5

this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
33 points (100.0% liked)

/kbin meta

39 readers
1 users here now

Magazine dedicated to discussions about the kbin itself. Provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics. ---- * Roadmap 2023 * m/kbinDevlog * m/kbinDesign

founded 1 year ago