357
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ocelot@lemmies.world 15 points 1 year ago

Electrek has a long history of anti tesla clickbait. Take this with a grain of salt.

Teslas are factory equipped with a 360 degree dashcam yet we never see any footage of these alleged incidents.

[-] silvercove@lemdro.id 45 points 1 year ago

Are you kidding me? Youtube is full of Tesla FSD/Autopilot doing batshit crazy things.

[-] Ocelot@lemmies.world 7 points 1 year ago

so can you provide a link of an accident caused by FSD?

[-] zeppo@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Musk just did a 20 minute video that ended with it trying to drive into traffic.

[-] Ocelot@lemmies.world 3 points 1 year ago
[-] zeppo@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

The video ended when he made an “intervention” at a red light. I’m not watching whatever link that is because I’m not a masochist.

[-] Ocelot@lemmies.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Here's the specific timestamp of the incident you mentioned in case you wanted to actually see it: https://youtu.be/aqsiWCLJ1ms?t=1190 The car wanted to move through the intersection on a green left turn arrow. I've seen a lot of human drivers do the same. In any case, its fixed now and never was part of any public release.

The video didn't end there, it was near the middle. What you're referring to is a regression specifically with the HW3 model S that failed to recognize one of the red lights. Now I'm sure that sounds like a huge deal, but here's the thing...

This was a demo of a very early alpha release of FSD 12 (current public release 11.4.7) representing a completely new and more efficient method of utilizing the neural network for driving and has already been fixed. It is not released to anyone outside of a select few Tesla employees. Other than that it performed flawlessly for over 40 minutes in a live demo.

Other than that it performed flawlessly for over 40 minutes in a live demo.

I get that this is an alpha, but the problem with full self driving is that's way worse than what users want. If chatgpt gave you perfect information for 40 minutes (it doesn't) and then huge lies once, we'd be using it everywhere. You can validate the lies.

With FSD, that threshold means a lot of people would have terrible accidents. No amount of perfect driving outside of that window would make you feel very happy.

[-] Ocelot@lemmies.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You realize that FSD is not an LLM, right?

If its "Way Worse" then where are all the accidents? All teslas have 360 dashcams. Where are all the accidents?!

I didn't say FSD was an LLM. My comment was implementation agnostic. My point was that drivers are less forgiving to what programmatically seems like a small error than someone who is trying to generate an essay.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 3 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/aqsiWCLJ1ms?si=D9hbZtbC-XwtxjpX

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[-] naeemthm@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Your posts here show you’re not interested in reality, but I’ll leave a link anyway

https://www.motortrend.com/news/tesla-fsd-autopilot-crashes-investigations/

Excited to see your response about how this is all user error.

[-] Ocelot@lemmies.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm sure you're just going to downvote this and move on without reading but I'm going to post it anyway for posterity.

First, a little about me. I am a software engineer by trade with expertise in cloud and AI technologies. I have been an FSD beta tester since late 2020 with tens of thousands of incident-free miles logged on it.

I'm familiar with all of these incidents. Its great that they're in chronological order, that will be important later.

I need to set some context and history because it confuses many people when they refer to the capabilities of autopilot and FSD. Autopilot and FSD (Full Self-Driving) are not the same thing. FSD is a $12,000 option on top of any Tesla, and no Tesla built prior to 2016 has the hardware capability to run FSD.

The second historical point is that FSD did not have any public release until mid-2022, with some waves of earlier releases going to the safest drivers starting in mid-2021. Prior to that it was exclusive to Tesla employees and select few trusted beta testers in specific areas. Any of the issues in this article prior to mid-2021 are completely irrelevant to the topic.

Tesla's autopilot system is an LKAS (Lane keep assist system). This is the same as is offered in Honda (Honda Sensing), Nissan (Pro Pilot Assist), Subaru, Cadillac, etc. Its capabilities are limited to keeping you in your lane (via a front-facing camera) and maintaining distance to the car in front of you (via radar, or cameras in later models). It does not automatically change lanes. It does not navigate for you. It does not make turns or take exits. It does not understand most road signs. Until 2020 it did not even know what a red light was. It is a glorified cruise control and has always been presented as such. Tesla has never advertised this as any sort of "hands-off" system where the driver does not need to pay attention. They do not allow the driver to lose attention from the road in FSD either, requiring hands-on the wheel and constant torque as well as eyes on the road (via an interior camera) in order to work. If you are caught not paying attention enough times the system will disengage and even kick you out of the program with enough violations.

OK, now that being said, lets dig in:

November 24, 2022: FSD malfunction causes 8-car pile-up on Bay Bridge

  • I'm from the area and have driven this exact spot hundreds of times on FSD and have never experienced anything even remotely close to what is shown here
  • "Allegedly" with FSD engaged
  • Tesla FSD "phantom" braking does not behave like this, and never has in the past. Teslas have 360 degree vision and are aware of traffic in front of and behind them.
  • Notice at the beginning of the video that this car was in the process of a lane change, this introduces a couple of possibilities as to what happened here, namely:
  • Teslas do have a feature under autopilot/FSD that if after multiple warnings for the driver to pay attention and no engagement, the car will slow down and pull over to the shoulder and stop. This particular part of the bay bridge does not have a shoulder, so it stopped where it is. This seems unlikely, since neural networks are very capable of identifying what a shoulder is and that its in an active lane of traffic, and even with tesla's massive fleet of vehicles on FSD there are no other recorded instances of this happening anywhere else.
  • This particular spot on the bay bridge eastbound has a very sudden and sharp exit to Yerba Buena Island. What I think happened is that the driver was aiming for this exit, saw that they were about to miss it and tapped the brake and put on the turn signal not realizing that they just disengaged FSD. The car then engaged regen braking and came to a full stop.
  • When a tesla comes to a full stop automatically (an emergency stop) it puts the hazards on automatically. This has been a feature since the v1 autopilot days. This car’s hazards do not come on after the stop.
  • What seems especially weird to me is that the driver continued to let the car sit there at a full stop while traffic piled up behind them. In FSD you are always in control of your own car and all it would have taken is tapping the accelerator pedal to get moving again. FSD will always relinquish control over the car to you if you tap the brakes or grab and move the steering wheel hard enough. Unless there was some mechanical issue that brought the car to a stop and prevented it from moving, in which case this is not the fault of the FSD software.
  • Looking at how quickly (or lack thereof) the car slowed down this seems to very clearly be the car using regen braking, not emergency braking. I'm almost positive this means that FSD was disengaged completely.
  • We don't have all the facts on this case yet and I'll be anxious to see how this plays out in court but there are definitely many red flags on this one that have me questioning what actually happened here, but I doubt if FSD has anything to do with it.
  • If my earlier point is true this is actually an instance of an accident being caused because the driver disengaged self-driving. The car would have been much safer if the driver wasn't even there.

April 22, 2022: Model Y in "summon mode" tries to drive through a $2 million jet

  • This one is a favorite among the tesla hate community. Understandably so.
  • Smart summon has 0 to do with FSD or even autopilot. It is a party trick to be used under very specific supervised processes
  • Smart summon relies exclusively on the front camera and ultrasonic sensors
  • While smart summon is engaged, the user still has full control over their car via the phone app. If the car does anything unexpected you only need to release your finger from the button and the car stops immediately. The "driver" did not do this and was not supervising the car, the car did not see the jet because it was entirely above the ultrasonic sensors, and as I'm sure you can understand the object recognition isn't exactly trained on parked airplanes.
  • The app and the car remind the driver each and every time it is engaged that they need to be within a certain range and within eyesight of the car to use it. If you remote control your car into an obstacle and it causes an accident, its your fault, period.
  • Tesla is working on a new version of smart summon which will make this feature more useful in the future.

February 8, 2022: FSD nearly takes out bicyclist as occupants brag about system's safety

  • I suggest actually watching the video here. What happened is highly at odds with what is actually in the video, but the vid is just over an hour long so I bet most people don't bother watching it.
  • "It wouldn't have hit them, it definitely wouldn't have hit them. Do we need to cut that?" "No, you can keep it in"
  • If you look at what was happening on the car's display, it detected someone entering the crosswalk and stepping out into traffic on the left side. The car hit the brake, sounded an alert and swerved to the right. There was a bicycle in front of where the car swerved but at no point was it about to "nearly take out a bicyclist". It did definitely overreact here out of safety but at no point was anyone in danger.
  • Relatively speaking this is a very old version of FSD software, just after the first wave of semi-public release.

December 6, 2021: Tesla accused of faking 2016 Full Self Driving video

  • lol

March 17, 2021: Tesla on Autopilot slams into stationary Michigan cop car

  • Now we're getting into pre-FSD autopilot. See above comments about the capabilites of autopilot. Feel free to compare these to other cars LKAS systems. You will see that there are still lots of accidents across the board even with LKAS. That is because it is an assist system and the driver is still fully responsible and in-control of the car.

June 1, 2020: Tesla Model 3 on Autopilot crashes into overturned truck

  • Again, pre-FSD. If the driver didn't see the overturned truck and disengaged to stop then I'm not sure how anyone expects a basic LKAS system to be able to do that for them.

March 1, 2019: NHTSA, NTSB investigating trio of fatal Tesla crashes

  • This one involves a fatality, unfortunately. However, the car was not self-driving. There is something else very important to point out here:
  • The feature that allows Teslas to change lanes automatically on the freeway (Navigate on Autopilot) was not released until a year after this accident happened. That means, that if AP was engaged in this accident, the driver deliberately instructed the car via engaging the turn signal to merge into that truck.

May 7, 2016: First known fatality involving Tesla's Autopilot system

  • Now we're getting way back into the V1 autopilot systems which weren't even made by tesla. This uses a system called MobilEye and is made by a third party and is even less capable than V2 autopilot

So, there we go. FSD has been out to the public for a few years now to a massive fleet of vehicles, driving collectively millions upon millions of miles and this is the best we've got in terms of a list showing how "Dangerous" it is? That is pretty remarkable.

Excited to see your response.

[-] naeemthm@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Interesting, you wrote an entire dissertation on why you think this is all a false flag about Full Self Driving, but it seems to be mostly anecdotal or what you think is happening. Being a “software by trade” isn’t enough to face the facts that something fishy is 100% going on with Tesla’s autopilot system.

“The last time NHTSA released information on fatalities connected to Autopilot, in June 2022, it only tied three deaths to the technology. Less than a year later, the most recent numbers suggest 17 fatalities, with 11 of them happening since May 2022. The Post notes that the increase in the number of crashes happened alongside a rapid expansion of Tesla’s "Full Self-Driving" software from around 12,000 vehicles to almost 400,000 in about a year”

https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a44185487/report-tesla-autopilot-crashes-since-2019/#

You claim the timeline is important here and this is all post-2022.

[-] Ocelot@lemmies.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I am not a "Software by trade" that was a typo. Believe it or not I wrote that entire thing on mobile.

Correlation does not equal causation. Tesla sold a huge number more vehicles in the past 2 years than ever before. Also in 2019,2020 and part of 2021 not a lot of people were driving due to the pandemic.

And, yes, a lot of the first incident I covered there was mostly anecdotal or what I think is happening. Importantly, what I think is happening as someone with years and tens of thousands of miles of experience using FSD beta. I do not have the facts and also importantly, neither do you. I am interested to see what comes out of that court case, but from where I sit I do not think FSD was involved at all.

Please let me know where I have misrepresented facts, I will either correct them or cite sources.

Again, Teslas come with a factory installed 360 dashcam. It records all the time. Where are all of the videos of these FSD related incidents?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] adeoxymus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Tbh the other side is also anecdotal. There's no stats here.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] silvercove@lemdro.id 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] Ocelot@lemmies.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

See my huge post about that very accident right below. Do you have any other “Many many examples”?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Hotdogman@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

I saw the videos of them running over infants in strollers. Does that count?

[-] Ocelot@lemmies.world 11 points 1 year ago

on FSD? link please

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] kinther@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Wishful thinking that Tesla would publicly distribute footage of an accident caused by one of their cars...

[-] Ocelot@lemmies.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Its saved on to a thumb drive. any user can pull off and use or post the footage anywhere. It never gets uploaded to tesla, only snapshots and telemetry.

lol the anti tesla crew will downvote even the most basic facts.

[-] kinther@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

But is it technically the user's data, or is there some clause in Tesla car ownership that says it is Tesla the company's data?

Forgive me I'm ignorant of the fine details. I purchased a Chevy Bolt but had been looking into a Tesla as an alternative until Elon tried to be the super-cool Twitter guy.

[-] drdabbles@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Bud, we've seen literally thousands of videos of this happening, even from the Tesla simps. You're seven years behind on your talking points.

[-] Ocelot@lemmies.world 7 points 1 year ago

Can you link a few? Something where FSD directly or indirectly causes an accident?

[-] drdabbles@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

You're working very hard in this thread to remain in the dark. You could take two seconds to look for yourself, but it seems like you won't. Hell, they performed a recall because it was driving through stops. Something it'll still do, of course, but they performed a recall.

[-] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Elon literally had to hit the brakes manually in a Livestream of the self driving tech as the car was going to go strait through a red light. Like less than a week ago... SOOOO safe, all the news stories of it killing people are fake!

[-] drdabbles@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah. These people aren't even good liars, but they try their hardest to defend the complete nonsense and lies.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Ocelot@lemmies.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The recall was most definitely not for "driving through stops". It was to fix the behavior of doing a "rolling stop", which is something 99.5% of drivers do, which is how it learned to do that. Where do you see that it still does not make a complete stop at stop signs?

https://www.forbes.com/sites/bradtempleton/2022/02/01/feds-make-tesla-remove-rolling-stops-its-a-terrible-decision/?sh=67b344722111

I'm not trying to remain in the dark here, I'm just presenting facts. I'm very open to change my mind on this situation entirely just give me the facts. You said there were thousands of these videos I'm just asking for evidence. I just get downvoted and nobody posts any of the evidence.

Im an AI professional and have been an FSD beta tester for almost 3 years with tens of thousands of miles logged. How can I possibly be the one “in the dark” here?

[-] drdabbles@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

“rolling stop”

Or put another way by someone not desperate for Elon's attention, not stopping. Driving through stops.

Where do you see that it still does not make a complete stop at stop signs?

Signs, lights, it'll gladly not stop for any of them. Where do I see it? Real life. Actually owning one of these foolish gadgets for 5 years. Where do you see your examples?

Also, don't send me brad templeton opinion pieces, he's a complete hack and has outed himself as such many times. He does have a nice video explaining what he thinks of Tesla stans like you though. Did you watch that one, or do you only link his material when it's convenient?

I’m just presenting facts

No you aren't, you're presenting a curated social media marketing campaign. Congrats, you fell for the ad. Do you think that beer is going to make you more attractive, too?

I’m very open to change my mind on this situation entirely

Ok. Tell us what evidence it would take for you to completely change your mind on this and realize Elon is a hack, running a dangerous con with low quality software being released to cars in the US and Canada? What evidence would you require to change your mind and accept that Tesla doesn't properly test releases before they go out to customers?

I'm an AI professional

This has absolutely zero bearing on anything except that you're probably extremely susceptible to Elon's outright lies.

have been an FSD beta tester for almost 3 years

Doubt.

How can I possibly be the one “in the dark” here?

The term is "delusion".

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] DingoBilly@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Given your posts and rampant Tesla fanboyism, I honestly wouldn't be surprised if you're Elon himself just anxiously trying to save face.

Then again, Elon would just publicly sprout misinformation about it all so it probably isn't. Still, surprising that people are just so obsessed with Tesla they can't take the bad with the good.

[-] Ocelot@lemmies.world 6 points 1 year ago

all im asking for is some evidence of the bad. Nobody can provide it. It really shouldn’t be that hard.

[-] DingoBilly@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

You were provided evidence and disregard it and make excuses for it. It's hard to have a discussion if you just exclude all evidence for it.

Think of it another way, you're saying there's absolutely no way that FSD has ever failed in its publicly available software, even with hundreds of thousands of cars on the road? Use a logic test on yourself and ask if that's realistic.

[-] Kage520@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Fsd makes a TON of mistakes. I've had the beta from the first public release. I don't trust it to do anything more than lane holding and cruise control, with maybe some supervised lane changes. But it's a beta. I understand that I am helping to test beta software.

FSD in its current form should not be given to everyone. Tesla had it right when they gave it only to proven drivers (okay, it would have been better to test with paid employees, but I digress).

FSD right now is like handing the keys to your 15 year old child and going to sleep in the back while they drive you home.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, there's no readily available footage of the dead bodies flying into the street or being crushed under the wheels so it's made up. Of course.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 year ago

Hilariously I’ve also seen them accused of a pro-Tesla bias. Personally I think they are pretty balanced.

[-] Ocelot@lemmies.world 3 points 1 year ago

They do whatever gets them clicks. Facts do not matter.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And this opinion is based on what? Obviously every online news source is concerned with increasing readership. But I’m not aware of any consistent factual issues in their reporting.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
357 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59119 readers
1864 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS