380
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GloriaTheFox 76 points 1 year ago

The first version was actually patented, so we know how that one worked fully. The latest versions are secretive but they still likely measure the same thing.

https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Secrets/E-Meter/hubbard-patent.html

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 48 points 1 year ago

Or given that the device’s purpose is to be a prop for psychological manipulation, the current ones might, rather than simply reading out skin resistance, produce some other value more conducive to that purpose. I’m which case, dumping and disassembling the firmware would be as much a threat to Scientology as dumping slot machine firmware would be to casinos and gambling firms. (True story: someone once did this with a slot machine, proving that it was rigged.)

[-] TheRaven@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago
[-] Cabrio@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago
[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The scions of prions? Lucky pions!

Hey Shakespeare did it, so it can't be wrong.

[-] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Sadly midichlorians make sense compared to episodes 7, 8 and 9.

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My headcanon is that they’re a bacteria that feeds on the force rather than that they control the force or grant powers. They need a host so that’s why you find lots of them in force sensitive people.

[-] Anomalous_Llama@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

My head cannon is just that they’re attracted to beings that can manipulate the force

They don’t give any powers. But the more you have the higher your latent abilities are and they can just sense that

[-] Bizarroland@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Although you do realize that technically, if their new versions are not patented then they are considered trade secrets right? If you can get your hands on one and patent it then you have a decent pathway to sue the Church of Scientology for patent infringement.

That would be a fun one to work out

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 year ago

They could get your patent invalidated if they can demonstrate you copied them

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

I like that fundamental misunderstandings of how the law works can still be found on this website, was my favorite part of reddit

[-] Rayston@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

wouldnt that force them to admit the public patent and all its details are a copy? thus confirming exactly how the device works.....and isnt that something they dont want?

[-] Bizarroland@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

They would still have to pay an inordinate amount of money in legal fees fighting it, and if they invalidate the patent then the publication would go public domain.

this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
380 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59227 readers
2914 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS