1553
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dojan@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

This once more reminds me of the guy in Sweden who got assaulted by police, in his bed, because an American institution searched through his Yahoo mail and found pictures and videos of him and his 30 year old boyfriend and incorrectly flagged it as CSAM, and then forwarded it to Swedish authorities.

There was no justice after that. No repercussions for either the Swedish police or the American government, and no damages paid to the guy.

Could this sort of surveillance stop abuse of minors? Yeah absolutely, but at what cost?

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago

You’re equating a companies refusal to host links to piracy (or CSAM) and… literal assault?

[-] dojan@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Yeah, absolutely. That's literally what I said. In fact CSAM should come bundled on every single electronic device. Then it won't be a problem anymore.

Of course not. My comment was in response to the discussion about companies going through private emails and the like (which I recognise the original post isn't about, but that's what this conversation turned into) and how I take issue with that. You might argue that we have no right to privacy when we use products like gmail and whatnot, which would be a fair argument if they didn't already dominate the market.

this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
1553 points (100.0% liked)

Asshole Design

1213 readers
1 users here now

Nothing comes before profit -- especially not the consumer.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS