789
There is a drop in monthly active Lemmy users (from 65k to 57k)
(lemmy.fediverse.observer)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
789 points (100.0% liked)
Fediverse
17669 readers
3 users here now
A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.
Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".
Getting started on Fediverse;
- What is the fediverse?
- Fediverse Platforms
- How to run your own community
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
I get it with the others, but given what Google is currently trying to do with Chrome and the open web, I think the Firefox evangelism is the least sinful of these by far. Or maybe I just became part of the problem.
It's not inherently bad, I don't even disagree with it. It's just that (A) we all get it, enough already and (B) the open web is about letting people use whichever browser they want, so it's kinda paradoxical that we all say we should all be using the same browser
It's not even that these evangelizers think we should all be using the same browser. It's that there are currently only two realistic choices: Chrome (and it's derivatives) and Firefox (and it's derivatives). There is safari too, of course, but it hardly compares to either in it's current state.
Given those two choices, only one of them is in support of the open web. The other is literally trying to add DRM to the web.
As to your first point: I agree that here it may be preaching to the choir and that we all get it. But it has such a small marketshare, I'm not sure it is good for those encouraging it to be quitened.
Curious to hear you elaborate on this. It's the #2 browser by marketshare and Apple, while slower in the past, seems to be hearing developer feedback and catching up to what we're asking.