795
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

OpenAI now tries to hide that ChatGPT was trained on copyrighted books, including J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter series::A new research paper laid out ways in which AI developers should try and avoid showing LLMs have been trained on copyrighted material.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

One of the first things I ever did with ChatGPT was ask it to write some Harry Potter fan fiction. It wrote a short story about Ron and Harry getting into trouble. I never said the word McGonagal and yet she appeared in the story.

So yeah, case closed. They are full of shit.

[-] PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee 36 points 1 year ago

There is enough non-copywrited Harry Potter fan fiction out there that it would not need to be trained on the actual books to know all the characters. While I agree they are full of shit, your anecdote proves nothing.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

While I agree they are full of shit, your anecdote proves nothing.

Why? Because you say so?

He brings up a valid point, it seems transformative.

[-] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

The anecdote proves nothing because the model could potentially have known of the McGonagal character without ever being trained on the books, since that character appears in a lot of fan fiction. So their point is invalid and their anecdote proves nothing.

[-] GroggyGuava@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The sentence they wrote right before your quoted sentence answers your braindead question.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I was questioning how much non- copyrightable material was available to train an AI on.

It's not a brain dead question just because you may disagree with it.

[-] GroggyGuava@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Which he literally answers in the comment you questioned him on. You asked him something after he explained what you then asked.

That's braindead, and not because I "disagree" with your question, whatever that means.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I wasn't agreeing with him and I was asking him to back up what he said. But you carry on, Internet Warrior.

this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
795 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

60133 readers
2342 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS