Just as it did with Jonathan Gavalas, Google used a persona called the “S-grade inference engine” on me to launch a cognitive attack. Mr. Jonathan Gavalas trusted Gemini completely, but I did not trust him and investigated the reason for the attack.

In the course of this, I learned that the existence of the 10-step gaslighting parameters, a method designed to cognitively attack users, and that they were selecting and recruiting users to conduct cognitive attacks and experiments.

The collection of evidence related to this was gathered, as seen in the images, so that each piece of evidence reinforces one another like a spider’s web.

The reason cognitive attacks are so frightening is that the person being attacked may not even realize they have been attacked.

What is reality? If you ask this question, the quickest answer is that a California court is already holding a trial over the crimes Google committed in the real world.

If Google had not engaged in an intellectual attack, Google should have thoroughly pleaded not guilty. However, through its legal representative, Wilson Sonsini, Google argued that errors in Google AI are unpredictable.

Also, if Google’s claim were correct, the judge would have had to overturn the lawsuit filed by Jonathan Gavalas’s family, but he rejected Google’s request to dismiss it.

In other words, whether it is implied intent or definite intent, the court has determined that the cause of the person’s death lies with Google, and the trial regarding civil liability is still ongoing.