126
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Catoblepas 52 points 1 day ago

As a trans person I see this as a ‘do not travel’ map.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 21 hours ago

red usually means danger zone. and its right to assume that.

[-] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It really depends. Some of these areas that aren't literally out in the sticks or old sundown towns, they're just ignorant morons and not dangerous face to face.

Source: I've lived in several of these places for far more years than I'll ever care to contemplate and boy do I understand the social isolation trans people have to live with... These ignorant hicks are harmless in the literal sense, but they'll still give weird looks and cold shoulders to anything their tiny shriveled brains fail to understand. Which is a lot.

[-] Catoblepas 12 points 1 day ago

My hometown is one of these red areas, I haven't been back in almost a decade and I don't plan on returning any time soon. I disagree that they're harmless; hate crimes against queer people have only gone up in the past few years. It can happen anywhere, but it's way more likely to happen in one of these red areas.

[-] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

I say what I said because it's true: Most are just ignorant morons. That is to say, they might be persuaded by the right candidate. OFC there are still some dangerous piles of shit. There are dangerous piles of shit everywhere. Just because the dangerous pile of shit might be the sheriff in these places does not make these places unreachable or worthy of a "no-go" status.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 21 hours ago

this is not a place for a poc, or a lgbtq+ . it safe if you are white and straight.

[-] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 1 points 20 hours ago

Nope. Safe otherwise, too. You do not understand the DEEP cowardice that permeates these fuckheads.

[-] Catoblepas 2 points 14 hours ago

https://www.safehome.org/data-lgbtq-state-safety-rankings/

It’s not and it’s weird you’re this fixated on hand waving away crimes against queer people.

[-] Catoblepas 5 points 1 day ago

You go places you feel safe, I’ll avoid places I feel unsafe.

[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 points 21 hours ago

sure but if you say that to women Theresa outrage about victims blaming... sigh

[-] Catoblepas 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I can still be assaulted in places that I feel safe 🤷‍♂️

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago

Also a lot of places we feel unsafe it's a problem we're unsafe there

[-] Janx@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

Voting against the interests of yourself and everyone in your community can be dangerous.

[-] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 1 points 20 hours ago

Can be. Not dangerous enough, I'd say.

Given how gerrymandering works its not adequate. Notice how there's no red in California on this map?

this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2026
126 points (100.0% liked)

Data is Beautiful

3899 readers
77 users here now

Be respectful

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS