43
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2026
43 points (100.0% liked)
RetroGaming
29665 readers
145 users here now
Vintage gaming community.
Rules:
- Be kind.
- No spam, AI slop, or soliciting for money.
- No racism or other bigotry allowed.
- Obviously nothing illegal.
If you see these please report them.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I work on PCSX2 in a small capacity. They're not my cup of tea, and I feel like they actively hamper a first or second or possibly even third playthrough. However, I've had some modest enjoyment adding them to games I beat 50 times over in the PS2's heyday just to have a better sense of permanence, to see if I'm good enough for the harder-ish challenges of dedicated fans, and to (ideally) see cute puns/references in the achievement names.
I think achievements are actively bad for a first playthrough and only, in that capacity, serve to turn games into a checklist simulator that cynically exploits dopamine pathways. But I also won't nag the people who do use them for first playthroughs, even though I think they'd holistically enjoy them more without.
On the whole, RetroAchievements clearly breathe new life into games for a ton of people, and I've got no problem with that.
Also, the people who develop the RA infrastructure are really cool from what I've heard and seen.