28
Geolocation without a GPS
(codeberg.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
28 points (100.0% liked)
Android
34513 readers
128 users here now
DROID DOES
Welcome to the Android community on Lemmy. Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules
1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.
2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.
4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.
5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.
6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.
7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.
8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.
Community Resources:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah of course you can, but why?
Power consumption is way lower and satellite acquisition takes time (or you keep your GPS running and warm/hot-start, but that draws even more power)
You have that backwards. Power consumption is way lower using WiFi and cell.
Thats what I am saying :) wifi scans are cheap compared to booting up GPS.
it would help investigators if you get murdered
Cops won't even get off their asses for stolen property with an airtag, location history, and even clear video footage.
...how?
I'm not sure why anyone thinks receiving GPS data is "bad".
If you're somewhere where GPS is frequently jammed (such as a warzone, etc.) then it could be useful.
Receiving GPS data is not bad. Apps like this are more for demonstrating cool technology, not for practical use (though it seems to be working really well as well).
That being said, MicroG does use BeaconDB as a network location provider, so there is a lot of utility there as well.
Enegy use comes to mind.
GPS is a passive receiver.
There's processing going on, but you dramatically decrease energy use by just updating less often.
It's not like you're sending a signal to space.
what are you talking about? GPS is far from a "passive receiver" in any sense of that vague term. It's running an oscillator at the carrier frequency.
GPS is probably the most power hungry sensor on your device.
I am aware of that but somehow expected that it still took more energy to receive until there are enough SATs available than to do a BLE scan. Just a gut feeling though and only receiving should have a bigger impact than I thought. Makes sense!
Don't worry your gut feeling is right. Wifi / Bluetooth scans are orders of magnitude cheaper. People in here don't unterstand how localization works.
I think it's more of "isn't this really cool" than "this is pratical to use". It's a proof of concept of a really cool idea.
It can help with location when you're on a device that doesn't have a GPS receiver. Like a laptop.
It might also help with initial positioning since it can take several seconds or minutes to get a GPS lock.
Edit: For anyone who want to contribute to BeaconDB there is NeoStumbler on F-Droid
Yes, MicroG uses BeaconDB to accelerate getting a lock.