I don't understand what this adds that the "traditional" recipe style is missing. I even see some things it's lacking. For example, the last 4 ingredients should be mixed together independently before folding in to the base.
I don't dislike this format, but I just don't see why it's so revolutionary.
If the last 4 ingredients need mixing together first, then you simply have a mix column with just those ingredient rows under the mix column from above to show that those get mixed independently in parallel. This recipe implies that is unnecessary for this food though.
I guess it's just a revolutionary idea for those that didn't grow up in a time when we already did this. This is pretty much what all my recipes (inherited from my grandmother) look like today, just without the bracketing.
For example, the last 4 ingredients should be mixed together independently before folding in to the base.
Isn't that indicated by the combination of rows?
I like this chart. It even allows for ~~multithreaded~~ multi-person baking, because the combination of rows indicates where processes are merged (and need to be done).
Edit: I may be dumb. A mix step is missing below the mix block of the other ingredients, but it could easily be included.
Right, I was about to say that the big near-square in the middle bottom could easily be used to indicate this as a separate process. I really like this format!
I don't understand what this adds that the "traditional" recipe style is missing. I even see some things it's lacking. For example, the last 4 ingredients should be mixed together independently before folding in to the base.
I don't dislike this format, but I just don't see why it's so revolutionary.
If the last 4 ingredients need mixing together first, then you simply have a mix column with just those ingredient rows under the mix column from above to show that those get mixed independently in parallel. This recipe implies that is unnecessary for this food though.
It clearly shows the sequential and parallel threads of execution:
It clearly shows the sequence of produced intermediate results, split and merging points:
Because it fits on a little card. Which everyone used to keep recipes on for a long time. Little boxes full of recipe cards.
I guess it's just a revolutionary idea for those that didn't grow up in a time when we already did this. This is pretty much what all my recipes (inherited from my grandmother) look like today, just without the bracketing.
Its not as universal as you are suggesting here. I've seen it before but there are certainly no cards like this in the boxes I've inherited.
Luckily most recipes won't go super wide
Isn't that indicated by the combination of rows?
I like this chart. It even allows for ~~multithreaded~~ multi-person baking, because the combination of rows indicates where processes are merged (and need to be done).
Edit: I may be dumb. A mix step is missing below the mix block of the other ingredients, but it could easily be included.
Right, I was about to say that the big near-square in the middle bottom could easily be used to indicate this as a separate process. I really like this format!