300
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] arsCynic@piefed.social 10 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)
  1. The point is that the terrifying systemic problem of school shooters should be tackled at its root causes, not merely suppressing symptoms. It's beyond absurd that schools in the US have become institutions of normalized violence.
  2. Going to another room and closing the door renders any drone "not very effective…" School shooters have nothing left to lose. These drones are an extremely expensive yet stupid way of defusing such people. From the article:

The drones can remain airborne for about eight minutes on a single battery charge
I know the US is plagued by obesity, but I'm pretty sure the average shooter can outrun a drone for more than 8 minutes inside a building. What a bad joke. This is simply about signing contract deals for weapons manufacturers because everything about this screams poor taste.
However, not everyone is convinced the drones are the right approach.

That includes Tony Montalto, whose 14-year-old daughter Gina Montalto was among the 17 people killed in the 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas high school in Parkland, Florida. He told WPTV: “These drones aren’t patrolling – they just pop up when needed. So that’s part of the problem. We need to focus on the prevention piece rather than the reaction piece.”

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 0 points 19 hours ago

"Its not perfect, therefore no effort should be expended toward any possible harm reduction"

[-] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

This assumes that there is a potential for harm reduction in this proposal...which there is not.

[-] arsCynic@piefed.social 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

“Its not perfect, therefore no effort should be expended toward any possible harm reduction”
2lSOYohMU6B4G3C.jpeg

Non sequitur fallacy and then some. Not only didn't I say "it's not perfect", I said it's completely stupid such as what's depicted in the illustration above. I also didn't say "no effort should be expended", in fact, my first sentence proves the contrary: most efforts should be concentrated on the root causes. And the last sentence quotes the article, symptomatic measures should be prevention, e.g., patrol. Money towards these drones can be spent far more wisely.

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago

Wait until you find out drones are used for patrols too.

[-] arsCynic@piefed.social 3 points 18 hours ago

Wait until you find out drones are used for patrols too.

Outside this makes total sense. Inside, not at all. And I say this as a quadcopter pilot myself.

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

This isn't a case of perfect being the enemy of good. This is a case of the drones simply not being a good response.

this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
300 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

86713 readers
2871 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS