300
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rothe@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago

Seems to me that it does in fact mean that that excuse for gun proliferation is pretty useless.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 4 points 22 hours ago

Well that's one hell of a non-sequitur. To make a sweeping generalization, it's not the guns' fault that Americans are cowards.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

A majority of US gun owners like what the government is doing, how does that make them cowards?

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 19 hours ago

I'm talking about Americans that don't like what the government is doing (there's a lot to criticise the American right for, but unwilling to act they are not). There's plenty of gun ownership among American liberals, and gun ownership aside the Trump regime's approval rating is in the tank yet barely anybody is actually doing anything.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

So they are supposed to kill the majority of Americans who have guns that like what the government is doing?

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 17 hours ago

The majority of Americans do not like what the government is doing, as seen from its approval rating, but also armed revolution usually doesn't happen by killing away everyone who disagrees with you.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

The majority of Americans with guns do like what the government is doing though. Gun ownership is well over double for Republicans and they currently strongly support ICE and many other abusive domestic policies.

Please point out an armed revolution that wasn't just wealthy people using humans as pawns in their struggle for control. I can name only one and that was Haiti.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 16 hours ago

The majority of Americans with guns do like what the government is doing though. Gun ownership is well over double for Republicans and they currently strongly support ICE and many other abusive domestic policies.

Uh... therefore?

Please point out an armed revolution that wasn't just wealthy people using humans as pawns in their struggle for control.

I'm not sure how that's relevant here. Most revolutions tend to be about wealthy people using humans as pawns in their struggle for control, but also: Yemen, Syria, Iran, Cuba, Russia, China, Mexico, Ireland*2, decolonization in general. There's also two Frances (1830, 1848) but those are more iffy.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

I was just restating what I said already for clarification since that is what we were discussing.

When people talk armed revolution the track record is pretty much shit for human rights. Mythological thinking that an armed rebellion is going to solve our problem is problematic to say the least.

this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
300 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

86713 readers
2871 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS