251
I'm sorry
(lemmy.zip)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2026
251 points (100.0% liked)
linuxmemes
32248 readers
35 users here now
Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
- Instance-wide TOS: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
- Lemmy code of conduct: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html
2. Be civil
- Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
- Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
- Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
- Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
- Bigotry of any kind will not be tolerated. This is an LGBTQ+-friendly community -- if that is a problem for you, you should leave.
3. Post Linux-related content
- Including Unix and BSD.
- Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of
sudoin Windows. - No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
- Don't come looking for advice, this is not the right community.
4. No recent reposts
- Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves / tolerates / hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
5. π¬π§ Language/ΡΠ·ΡΠΊ/Sprache
- This is primarily an English-speaking community. π¬π§π¦πΊπΊπΈ
- Comments written in other languages are allowed.
- The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
- Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
6. (NEW!) Regarding public figures
We all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations. - Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
- We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
- Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed. Β
Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Nix, yes, because it has rollbacks
If you need rollbacks, of course. I don't.
You need them like you need fire extinguishers
My Ubuntu LTS upgrade failed. Would have killed for a rollback
You need fire extinguishers if you have something worth saving.
Sometimes I just want to roll back one piece of software. Try doing that with flatpak
Wouldn't
flatpak uninstalldo that? Or what do you mean "roll back" in this case?Uninstall uninstalls the package. I want to use an older working version
Ah. Well, that's simple with pacman. π
Never used it, but I'm fairly sure you can't have conflicting dependencies with pacman. If package A requires a new dependency version and package B requires an older one you can't have both installed
This can happen and it's usually solved by just introducing a new package which is the old version of the package, and which won't be updated.
But this isn't really the aim of Arch. I've never had this issue except for with Spotify when installed via pacman, and then only needed it to get playback of local music files.
After I switched to installing it from Flatpak, it included all the necessary packages with correct versions (obviously, because that's how Flatpak works).
But as I said, the aim of Arch is to support working, latest versions of software. If you want to be able to roll back stuff, Arch is probably not for you, even if it's very simple to roll back stuff if you have the package file on disk or it's still available in the remote package repo. But if this is something you often come across, sure.