21
Why does Linux require password for decryption but not windows?
(sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2026
21 points (100.0% liked)
Asklemmy
55310 readers
478 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
That is not the point of TPM only unlock. Tell me, can you access the files on a windows system that automatically unlocks bitlocker and then boots to the windows login screen? What can you read without a user password? If you try to boot a different OS and read the data from there, the bitlocker encrypted drive will not be automatically unlocked.
Bitlocker TPM only mode is ment to protect against a stolen hard drive and attacks in which the whole laptop is accessed by attackers (like someone breaking into your hotel room while you are at breakfast). Now bitlocker is broken in TPM only mode and many vulnerabilities exist, but conceptually its purpose is not only to protect against a stolen hard drive.