Yeah any decision would be on a case by case basis, which is normally something you'd want to avoid.

I've seen a couple of Linux devs talk about how they just give a prompt to claude and walk away leaving it alone to spit out the code, none of which can be licensed as GPL. But good luck working out what specific lines of what specific patches of theirs used an LLM vs. were re-written or such.

Best to not believe anything KPMG says about AI.

Actually if KPMG say the sky is blue you should probably go outside and check and also make sure you still have your wallet.

yeah and the paintbrush somehow has abstracted access to millions of proprietary and copyleft licensed source code in forms of weight.

this is a clear misuse and abuse of any fair use rights, and clear push to centralisation of copyright to only a few companies with big budgets that can defend themselves.

i mean, can you really challenge and win against openai, a company backed by the govt, that your copyleft source code are misused as training data?