262
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by jksalcedo@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

Does anyone here actually support Google's Developer Verification?

I don’t. I’ve put a warning about it in my repo because I’m against policies like sideloading restrictions, forced ID verification.

Curious what other devs here think. Is Play Store still worth the hassle?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 days ago

Does that mean this app won't be available on app store, but can be installed from other places? I know there are on going changes regarding this topic, but I'm not fully informed. And researching will bring probably ton of Ai generated articles I'm not willing to look into. Could F-Droid still be used on a "regular" Android?

[-] DarkMetatron@feddit.org 31 points 3 days ago

What it means can be read, for example, in Detail here: https://keepandroidopen.org/en/

[-] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Holy mother of duck! This is worse than I thought. I assume custom firmware like LineageOS or e/OS don't have these restrictions. But most people have stock Android off course.

[-] DarkMetatron@feddit.org 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This rules are part of and enforced by the google play framework, so I would assume that as soon as Google Play and/or Google Play Services are installed on Lineage or other custom roms that then the same limitations come in effect. This is only an assuption by me, based on how I understand it, so I may be, and I hope that I am, very wrong.

[-] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 days ago

There is an alternative service called microG, an Open Source alternative to Google libraries to replace Google Play Services in example. This makes it possible to use the Play Store without Googles proprietary stuff. However I don't know how compatible it is, but it is big part of alternative custom roms to replace Google as much as possible. I don't use the Play Store, so cannot say first hand how good it works. More info on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MicroG .

Maybe this new policy and stuff could affect this alternative implementation of Google Services?

[-] Einskjaldi@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

They've been continually removing things from that and making actual Google stuff more required. To be fair, they had a good reason because it let them get around the carriers never updating anything.

[-] MrRandom@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

Few Android phones have stock Android, some get close to stock, most have branded Android, with bloat.

[-] lime@feddit.nu 17 points 3 days ago

they're going to make it more difficult too. you basically need to enable dev mode a second time, then for every application that can install ap, you need to re-approve then wait 24 hours.

[-] Phantaloons@piefed.zip 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Fuck that, I'll stay unverified/nogapps. They can keep their malware.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 6 points 2 days ago

No it means you won't be allowed to install the app on any certified devices at all. Regardless of where it's obtained.

[-] loutr@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

@thingsiplay@lemmy.ml is right, it just means Google will refuse to publish it on the Play Store. It can still be installed by going through a convoluted process to enable sideloading.

this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
262 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

47914 readers
237 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS