I'm still using mullvad. I don't care enough about political morals at this day in age. I wouldn't be allowed to operate life if I boycotted every service that went against my principles. I do tend to agree with the statement that while it may not be in my interest. What a co-founder does in a company isn't reflected on the company as a whole. If Mullvad was actively donating to structures or was advocating for it I might care more.

Being said, it goes without saying for me that, considering this picked up news trend in the US and is being shared across every news site and seems to have a massive following on X, which is a known bot platform and hive mind. I'm taking the entire thing with a massive grain of salt, as nothing is allowed onto US news without it being to some advantage of the current government structure. Which means that it's more likely this is being pushed as a nothing-burger with the intent to dissuade people from using a service that has no government controls.

I'm not saying he didn't do it because he has openly admitted to it, but I'm just saying I expect that the entire situation is being blown out of proportion if it's gained trending on US news sites