74
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
74 points (100.0% liked)
Linux
14082 readers
341 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I suppose it's pretty easy to see why when you consider what the most^[I could be wrong, but searching for "zsh" on GitHub and sorting it by most stars should be a pretty good metric.] popular plugins are for the popular shell
zsh:Both of which literally start by referencing
fishin their respective READMEs.And where
zshrequires plugins to get these,fishhas these by default. Perhaps unsurprising asfishstands for Friendly Interactive SHell. As such, the niceties don't stop there.Basically, if you want a no-nonsense shell that gets pretty much out of your way and comes with excellent defaults right of the gate, then you simply can't go wrong with
fish.Take this from someone that stubbornly tried to bend
bashto my will with stuff likeble.sh(link) and laterzshwith zsh-quickstart-kit, but to no avail... It always caused more trouble than it was worth. And when I finally gave in and triedfish, it was pure bliss from the get-go. The rest has been history... Fish has literally become the first thing I install on all my systems.Note, however, that (as per
fish' documentation) you shouldn't change your login shell tofish. This blogpost by a CoreOS engineer goes over it in more length.