1153
me_irl (discuss.online)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 32 points 4 days ago

Like so many grammar "rules", this one was caused by one fussy dude who got his panties in a twist about an aspect of language:

This isn't an example of how modern English is going to the dogs. Less has been used this way for well over a thousand years—nearly as long as there's been a written English language. But for more than 200 years almost every usage writer and English teacher has declared such use to be wrong. The received rule seems to have originated with the critic Robert Baker, who expressed it not as a law but as a matter of personal preference. Somewhere along the way—it's not clear how—his preference was generalized and elevated to an absolute, inviolable rule.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/fewer-vs-less

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 24 points 4 days ago

It's a semi obscure "rule" of zero consequence that carries a false sense of knowledgeable power. Of course fucking pedants love it

[-] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Why would they only love it whilst mid-coitus?

[-] davetortoise@reddthat.com 1 points 4 days ago
this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
1153 points (100.0% liked)

me_irl

7947 readers
700 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS