34
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] somegeek@programming.dev 1 points 11 hours ago

I think I did! Rust has lots of corporate and political backing from big companies and political/security firms (FBI, pentagon etc) and zig is more free and has less governance and backing, less politics involved.

[-] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

Those companies and firms back Rust because it's memory safe without a garbage collector, and great for general purpose programming or systems programming. That's super important for everyone, but especially large companies working on high performance or mission critical software.

Zig is not memory safe so it's a non-starter for these things, and has not proven itself in the industry anywhere near what Rust has.

This has nothing to do with Rust being "corporate" or anything wrong with Rust.

[-] somegeek@programming.dev 1 points 2 hours ago

Don't these companies and firms get more power in steering and forming the future, features and efforts of the rust project?

this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2026
34 points (100.0% liked)

Rust

8073 readers
14 users here now

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

!performance@programming.dev

Credits

  • The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS