85
Users of Arch-based distros, why don't you use pure Arch? (ani.social)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by kiri@ani.social to c/linux@programming.dev
114 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(No provocation)

I see these reasons:

  • newbie
  • lazy (don't wanna edit config files etc.)
  • unique features (like assistant/toolbox, some optimizations like in cachyos)
  • wanna check how different systems are set up (that's rather distrohopping)

Personally, I used manjaro i3 when I was beigginer and wanted to see how tiling WM should be configured (check out ranger config, for example). But after some time, I don't see reasons why not to just customize pure arch (same with debian and debian-based distros).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago

I googled 'gaming Linux distribution' and it basically gave me popos and cachy. Didn't like popos

[-] LostWanderer@fedia.io 3 points 1 month ago

LOL COSMIC is so not ready for a 1.0, honestly it is cursed ATM. System76 needed to leave that cake in the oven and let it bake longer! However, I do appreciate the direction that COSMIC is going, it just needs more time.

[-] kiri@ani.social 1 points 1 month ago

Did you tried install games from setup.exe installer? I tried wine, lutris, steam (via add non-steam game), but never had a success.

[-] nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 weeks ago

No, just steam content. Did you check winedb/protondb?

this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2026
85 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

14327 readers
293 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Ategon@programming.dev
anzo@programming.dev
dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev