371
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] xXthrowawayXx@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

So let me summarize:

You won’t tell me what I’ve lied about. You won’t clarify your position. You won’t confirm or deny what statements of fact you accept. You won’t accept the other posters in this thread as people (???).

You asked why you should engage in this discussion any further. I don’t believe you should. You seem to have nothing to say even when asked clear, direct questions intended to give you a platform to speak. There is no discussion here.

If, on the other hand, you do want to keep going (you do not have to. You can just not respond. No one will judge you.):

Based on your statement

twisting yourself into knots just to blame the US is absurd and not supported by the facts

Which was made in the context of other users blaming the United States for production of opium during the occupation of Afghanistan, I surmised you meant that the claim that the United States is responsible for opium production during the occupation of Afghanistan isn’t supported by the facts.

Was I wrong in that? If so, what blame being placed on the us isn’t supported by the facts?

[-] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] xXthrowawayXx@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

I’m not trolling. I haven’t insulted or accused you of anything and I’ve tried my level best to treat you with the kindness of Christ and patience of Job.

I’d like to know what you meant by

twisting yourself into knots just to blame the US is absurd and not supported by the facts

I took a look at the context, which was users blaming the us for opium production during its occupation of Afghanistan, and surmised you meant that the claim that the United States is responsible for opium production during the occupation of Afghanistan isn’t supported by the facts.

Was that a wrong assessment? If so, what blame being placed on the us isn’t supported by the facts?

[-] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago
[-] xXthrowawayXx@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

I want to understand what you meant. Ive refined my question to be as straightforward and clear as possible over our entire conversation.

If you think you’re being trolled then just don’t respond. Look away. Do something else.

If you are willing to have a conversation based on the thread topic:

I’d like to know what you meant by

twisting yourself into knots just to blame the US is absurd and not supported by the facts

The context is users blaming the us for opium production during its occupation of Afghanistan, and surmised you meant that the claim that the United States is responsible for opium production during the occupation of Afghanistan isn’t supported by the facts.

Was that a wrong assessment? If so, what blame being placed on the us isn’t supported by the facts?

[-] pissydickle@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

Hi guys, it's pissy dickle here. This is one of my lost alts. They seem to be misbehaving. This is sad because I taught all my alts not to use logical fallacies such as:

[-] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

what am I waking up to?

grow up

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
371 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32287 readers
529 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS