141
submitted 19 hours ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

In recent weeks, Iran has dramatically escalated efforts to seal off its cache of near bomb-grade uranium, deliberately collapsing tunnels and booby-trapping entrances with explosive mines, according to five sources familiar with US intelligence.

Getting to the roughly half-a-ton of highly-enriched uranium is now far more difficult, dangerous and time-consuming than it already was just a month ago, when President Donald Trump was publicly signaling that he might order the US military to seize it, the sources said.

The new fortifications by the Iranians add an additional layer of complexity to the Trump administration’s proposed deal with Tehran to remove and destroy its uranium, and the move raises questions about who will take on the dangerous task of digging it out.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works 3 points 16 hours ago

Can't "destroy" uranium anyway... unless they're planning for a little unscheduled fission reaction.

[-] Burninator05@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

You can't destroy it but you can unpurify it.

[-] rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago

By what, adding in less reactive species? What they probably have in mind is to pour a truckload of concrete on it.

[-] Redjard@reddthat.com 5 points 15 hours ago

You add it to enough regular uranium or uranium ore that the enrichment goes under fuel rod levels. One part weapons-grade to 4 parts unenriched uranium should be safe.

Adding it to concrete is not very effective, it's easy to purify uranium from other elements and then you just get your enriched uranium back. For separating elements you can use chemistry, only separating isotopes is hard.

[-] rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago

Adding it to concrete is not very effective, it’s easy to purify uranium from other elements and then you just get your enriched uranium back.

I don't think the United States have any intention of handing any of this uranium back to Iran were they to get their hands on it, hence there would be no pint in de-enrichment. My point is that they are probably going to store it in concrete dry cask storage somewhere they can secure, if they aren't going to put it for use to their own ends.

this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2026
141 points (100.0% liked)

World News

56545 readers
1364 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS