239
submitted 2 months ago by cm0002@lemy.lol to c/linux@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Its rather subjective but it wouldn’t be the first time updating arch has broken my system and its fair that some people don’t want to deal with that and much prefer some more mature.

And i have no qualms with people who do use debian for a main system but i do assume everyone who do are retired folk with a long career in computing behind them and aren’t in the market to change to another.

[-] anyhow2503@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

The AUR is not the standard arch package repository and arch as a distro shouldn't be judged by it's merits or dangers. Yes, obviously a rolling release distro is not the best fit for most people, but that's beside the point. Debian is completely fine for people who are looking to replace their windows machine with something stable and don't need ton of exotic software or especially recent packages.

LOL! I'm not THAT old hahahahaha!

But that sounds about right. I work in IT and troubleshoot IT problems all day. The last thing I want to do is troubleshoot my PC when I get home. I just want an OS that works. Debian is the best in that regards.

this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
239 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

14739 readers
401 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS