717
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
717 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
85543 readers
2910 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Sorry for the necro reply, been away for a but. It was a great icebreaker, actually. Still a little nerve-wracking given it was my first presentation outside of my directorate, but it was clear that this was a no-bullshit zone.
If you've seen NASA-related movies like The Martian, Apollo 13, or Hidden Figures the portrayal of the enthusiast/no-bs engineers and managers is actually true. There's no tiptoeing around or "whistling through the graveyard" - you see a problem, you talk it out. And it can get animated. But I can only think of a handful of cases where things ended in an impasse because we had the (math/science) resources to make sure things were right. Obviously that doesn't mean failures don't happen, but it really fine tuned the way I approach engineering problems to eliminate as many failure modes as was practical.
thanks!