377
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Babalugats@feddit.uk 33 points 1 week ago
[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Showing graphs not adjusted for inflation by default is disingenuous.

[-] Gamechanger@slrpnk.net 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

We did not have 500% inflation since 2022...

Edit: The total inflation rate from 2022 (Average) to Apr. 2026 is 13.79%

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Neat. Doesn't refute what I said.

[-] dbdr@nord.pub 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's true taking inflation into account would be useful. But when the increase was 5 to 7 times more in 4 years, inflation would not make a big difference.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

It’s true taking inflation into account would be useful.

Not useful - the proper way to do it.

[-] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 week ago

I appreciate the point you're making. However, even at a glance you can quite easily see there's a sudden jump well beyond inflation. On top of that, they also include a graph that does adjust for inflation. They look very similar. In fact, the only noteworthy difference is that the price (adjusted for inflation) has remained flat until this year, where it suddenly spiked.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

However, even at a glance you can quite easily see there’s a sudden jump well beyond inflation

I know - I can see too. But you show historic prices graphs adjusted for inflation.

[-] Babalugats@feddit.uk 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

it does show the inflated graphs.

But it doesn't really matter, it is obvious that the prices now are insane compared to:

2014 Brazil ticket prices ranged from €69 and the cheapest tickets for the final were priced at around €288

2018 Russia prices ranged from€79, while the most expensive final ticket in Moscow cost around €950

2022 Qatar ranged from€450 up to €1,000 or more.

Qatar was just scummy. The US following their lead is the same.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

But it doesn’t really matter

Yes it does. There's literally no reason to not just show the adjusted for inflation graphs.

[-] Babalugats@feddit.uk 4 points 1 week ago

They do show them. But the point is the crazy difference is noticed because it's so high, even without knowing the inflation rate.

But as mentioned. The charts with inflation are there.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

They do show them.

They hide them as secondary images. There is literally no reason to show unadjusted numbers for this.

[-] Babalugats@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago

Now who's being disingenuous..

They don't 'hide' them, they literally have a big banner across the chart telling users that 'this chart is without inflation, scroll over for one with inflation'.

At a guess (I don't know) I would imagine that the reason for the charts without inflation is to show users the original prices that they saw when they were collecting their data. It's the equivalent to saying something like "The prices were €100 back then, which, when adjusted for inflation is around €128 today".

I don't know why you're moaning here about it anyway, if it bothers you that much, why not contact the site admin or whoever compiled it and moan at them. Maybe you'll find out the exact reason that they have done it like that too 🤷

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

They don’t ‘hide’ them, they literally have a big banner across the chart telling users that ‘this chart is without inflation, scroll over for one with inflation’.

Sorry - what word would you use for "not visible" then? I didn't say they weren't available. They are... hidden.

I don’t know why you’re moaning here about it anyway

Because it calls into question the competence and motivation of the people who produced the charts.

[-] Babalugats@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

Sorry - what word would you use for “not visible” then? I didn’t say they weren’t available. They are… hidden.

They are not hidden. They are the 2nd slide of 2 slides, and it is clearly written:

This is WITHOUT Inflation. Scroll to see WITH Inflation

If you can see the chart, you can see that text.

Because it calls into question the competence and motivation of the people who produced the charts.

But, again, if you want to call in their competence or motivation, why not contact them and moan to them instead of doing it here? It achieves nothing.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

It says scroll but it means next image in the carosel.

this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
377 points (100.0% liked)

World News

56623 readers
2618 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS