224
Android 17 sucks. So I put Linux on a phone.
(www.youtube.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
224 points (100.0% liked)
Linux Phones
3190 readers
6 users here now
The Discussion on Linux-based Phones.
Benefits:
- Hardware freedom.
- Perfect operating-system competition.
- Full utilization of specs.
- Phone lifespan raises to 10+ years.
- Less e-waste.
Linux Mobile Distros:
- Ubuntu Touch
- Sailfish
- FuriOS
- Postmarket OS
- Mobian
- Pure OS
- Plasma Mobile
- LuneOS
- openSUSE Mobile
- Nemomobile
- Droidian
- Mobile NixOS
- ExpidusOS
- Maemo Leste
- Manjaro Arm
- Tizen
- WebOS
Linux Mobile Hardware:
- Fairphone 5
- Volla Phone
- PinePhone
- FLX1
- Librem 5
⚙️Contribute
🧼Go Clean From the Duopoly:
💻Related Communities:
📰News:
💬Messager:
⌚️Watch:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The wording on that table can be confusing; "Bootloader locked?" Yes/No is referring to the ability of Iodé installer and ROM to have that device bootloader re-locked after installation.
I can garantee you pretty much all of them come with a locked bootloader from the factory/shop (even if they have a "no" on that page), and it needs to be unlocked to install a different rom from the stock one. Doesn't matter what flavor of Android it is. It might be that IodéOS installer is doing the re-locking immediately after and so you'd think it wasn't ever unlocked, but it was.
Yeah, I took another look at it yesterday as I had worded it differently in my OP asking about it, and realised that it must be just presented incorrectly. I was wondering why I had asked differently.
For example in my OP I asked why the Samsung has "No" across the board, and above, I asked why the Motorola has "Yes" across the board. Maybe it refers to if the Bootloader can be re-locked.