554
Me_irl
(lemmy.today)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
554 points (100.0% liked)
me_irl
7959 readers
1811 users here now
All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
You are also espousing that there should be fewer home owners in a country that is already strained with wealth inequality.
I've just been waiting for you to say something actually useful.
Lol no I did not say that, to the contrary, I said there are a set number of houses (it does change but not very fast, not like other commodities like tomatoes or oil). And everyone needs one (1). That's why when people can borrow loads of cheap money, prices go up.
That's so hard to grasp?
Fascinating.
There aren't a set number of houses, though. We can build them according to need. Many projects in my area.
That's good and all and has an effect of course (many things do).
You sound like a college freshman at a low-tier midwestern university who just took a freshman business course and is now an expert in the actual economy.
You can’t collapse the assumptions of something as expansive and complicated as a housing market into basic notions of supply and demand. It is, without a bit of irony on your part, that you keep calling out literally everyone in the thread with “lol, don’t you understand basic economics???” More or less what everyone is trying to explain is that freshman level economics is not applicable to the real world here.
The truth that you can’t see is that your framework is just too overly simplified to matter here, as are your conclusions.
Insults is what the idiot uses when he's out of rhetoric.
It's not my fault you don't understand the the housing supply chain. Maybe you shouldn't try to "explain the basics" and sit back and think about it, it's not the simplest of things to be fair. I'm just answering because you seem eager to understand (and the lol is responses to more or less "u so stoopid, stoopid").
You already said you needed to rule out fundamental realities like the ability to create more supply quickly and easily. Nor the surplus we face.
I don't think you have the slightest idea of what you are talking about, that is all.
Yeah, they have no idea what they're talking about. They cannot provide any data to back up their claims, but apparently this hill is what they've chosen to die on.
You sound like an old AI, your first sentence is just gibberish, the second insulting.
That will get you nowhere lol.
You don't understand. I don't care. No one here does.
The point is you are applying college-freshman level principles to a rather complicated system. People keep arguing and downvoting not because of your self-perceived smart-troll brilliance, but because you are just spouting nonsense.
"no one cares about you" what a stellar argument.
Do I "care" you think? Here is how much I care about some homeowner who thinks he's smarter than economy professors:
Blocked.
Aww, boohoo. You couldn't back up your claims, spent hours arguing for them, and then have to end it with an embarrassing "blocked" like anyone gives a shit.
They are very smart™ internet trolls.
The truth is they are pretty easy to deal with. Actual argument? They just lol.
Explain to them that they have no credentials or real argument? Suddenly they really pissed.
Ah, you are the same account.
Blocked.
Lmao, that makes you seem a bit unhindged. Too bad.
Lol. "Blocked."
A powerful last word from someone with nothing to say. Lol.
Wait, you are referring to yourself as an "economy professor" now? Lol.
Child, I'm a university professor. Please stop using credentials like mine to play act.