79
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] leagman1@feddit.org 16 points 2 days ago

Looking forward to the digital euro

[-] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 19 points 2 days ago

I'll celebrate when I finally can ditch VISA and Mastercard. I already don't use them anymore domestically thanks to Twint, but as soon as I cross the border they are currently my only option (even for getting cash).

[-] leagman1@feddit.org 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Had to google Twint. It's a Swiss payment app, right?

If I got this right, the recent Wero should be its €-equivalent (edit: eurozone, not € per se).

The digital euro on the other hand - again, if I understand it correctly - is digital cash. So to pay with it, you'd have to have a specific digital pocket for it and then exchange Swiss franc for euro/digital euro.

[-] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 7 points 2 days ago

Yup, it's our home grown payment app that is widely accepted, from your local butcher and farm store to Mediamarkt and all major grocery stores.

Most of us have Euro accounts too, so exchanging money to use the digital euro abroad is no real issue. I go shopping for groceries and personal hygiene products in Germany once or twice per week.

[-] FlowerFan@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago
[-] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Wow no, just no!

I am nowhere near that ugly town.

[-] iammike@programming.dev 15 points 2 days ago

I'm afraid this is just an excuse for mass surveillance. At least, getting rid of American services is definitely a win.

[-] john_t@piefed.ee 12 points 2 days ago

The EU is not the bad guy you are looking for. You are already being mass surveilled by Visa and Mastercard.

[-] HereIAm@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

The EU are absolutely the bad guys if not kept on a short leash. I'm not very confident Chat Control would be stopped unless for the massive campaigning to educate them. They already want to weaken GDPR. Are we the US yet? No, but we all need to be very wary of the power creep. They are also looking into age-verification laws to protect the kids. Not all things EU are benevolent.

[-] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Completely agree. I'm hugely supportive of the EU, the things it has accomplished and the future potential. However, blindly agreeing with everything it does with black and white thinking is how we sleepwalk into our own authoritarian dystopia.

[-] john_t@piefed.ee 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They are also looking into age-verification laws
They should! Call me old fashioned but kids really shouldn't be on Facebook, Instagram, Tiktok, etc. It's just turning them into sociopaths manipulated by billionaires.

[-] HereIAm@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Sure, I do partially agree with that. But give parents better tools to monitor or restrict what their kids can access. Don't make every citizens online activity trackable. Just look at Texas what "nothing to hide" logic gets you; arrested for seeking abortion.

[-] dieTasse@feddit.org 4 points 2 days ago

They are not... Today... I bet Americans said the same years ago.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Oh, they are absolutely the bad guy we are looking for. Constantly working on undermining our privacy rights on behalf of lobbyists from US companies and organisations competing against those US companies now mostly in control of our data, is neither good nor pro EU souvereignity.

[-] leagman1@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Same. But if we somehow manage to make it not go to shit, it'd be just very strong and convenient imo. That's a big if ofc.

[-] HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Well, the rollout is a bit sketchy but it looks like it could really work

[-] oats@piefed.zip 2 points 2 days ago

Hopefully its not such a shit show like wero is now

[-] leagman1@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

Is it a shitshow? Afaik it's "just" super lackluster, missing vital functionality

[-] oats@piefed.zip 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I have four accounts that support wero. For each, its baked into the banking app. Each is totally different. While one can even generate qr codes for payment, the other only supports phone numbers from my address book, cant even input a number.

Oh, and it leaks my Iban if I actually pay with it.

[-] marcomedia@mastodon.green 0 points 6 hours ago

@oats "it leaks my Iban if I actually pay with it"

What did you expect? Simply put, wero is just a convenient way to make a SEPA Instant Credit Transfer. Of course, the bank details will appear in the transaction history afterward. 🤷

[-] oats@piefed.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

You mean inconvenient. At this point, it's a lot less hassle just to use sepa instant.

I want to send you money.

"Hey, does your bank support wero? Great. I need your phone number. No, my bank doesn't support sending to emails. OK, I saved it to my contacts, I can now open my bank app and send you your 5€."

vs

"5€? Sure. opens banking app what's your iban? OK, done"

[-] Scrollone@feddit.it 2 points 23 hours ago

Yeah I think the biggest problem of Wero is that you need to use your bank app.

Bank apps are usually bloated and shitty, and each one works differently. Just give us a basic and standard Wero app.

[-] oats@piefed.zip 2 points 22 hours ago

There even is an official wero app, but you cannot use it when your bank offers wero in theirs.

In my opinion the whole thing with wero being tied to your checking account is stupid. Most people have one. And dont want to give out the account data to their primary salary to everyone.

this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
79 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

11295 readers
622 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS