216

Seems like he's been pushed into using LLMs as a way to cope with the deluge of LLM-generated security reports.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

How do you know those were the result of the AI?

I quite deliberately tried to err on the side of fixing security issues for that release, and there were some valid (but unusual) use cases that got caught up in the changes.

Seems to me like it was just his own fault. AI may very well have had nothing to do with the regressions, other than maybe not identifying them?

[-] Nalivai@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

If the generator made a mistake, it's actually not its fault, and you can't prove it. If the code works, it's an amazing achievement of the machine, singularity is here, you don't need to look any further.

[-] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 2 points 10 hours ago

He rewrote the test suite to Python using AI tools, which I believe people are saying caused some otherwise detected cases to be missed.

this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
216 points (100.0% liked)

Programming

27148 readers
758 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS