136
submitted 1 day ago by Maeve@kbin.earth to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

The shift will strip away the political and diplomatic oversight mechanisms that make the relationship publicly accountable, moving it from a visible annual aid vote into the opaque machinery of defense acquisition, where oversight is limited and political accountability is minimal. The result would be a defense relationship that is simultaneously deeper and less transparent.

This all comes at a time when the Israeli military has repeatedly used U.S. weapons in strikes that have violated international humanitarian laws in Gaza, and as Israel has repeatedly violated ceasefires (as has the U.S. itself) in the Trump administration’s unnecessary war with Iran.

The enormous gulf between what most Americans want and what the president is doing when it comes to Israel and what Congress is proposing here should not be ignored. Just 30% of respondents to a New York Times/Sienna poll from mid-May believe Trump made “the right decision” to go to war with Iran, with 64% saying it was wrong. An Institute for Global Affairs poll released earlier this week dove even deeper into the American psyche when it comes to arming Israel, finding that “Just 16 percent say the United States should keep supplying Israel with weapons without new restrictions. Thirty-eight percent want to stop supplying weapons entirely, and another 24 percent want weapons conditioned on how they’re used.”

Yet, mainstream leadership in both parties remains largely pro-Israel and continues to shape the base legislative text before amendments and broader congressional debate open it to the full body, as is the case with this NDAA provision.

Crosspost from https://lemmy.ml/post/48024011

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] davel@lemmy.ml 20 points 22 hours ago

“National interest” has always been a euphemism for “bourgeois class interest.” It has never meant our interests, those of the proletarian majority. Previously.

[-] AlHouthi4President@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 hours ago

“National interest” has always been a euphemism for “bourgeois class interest.”

This is correct. American "national security interests" is an ideological cover for the monopoly capitalist interests themselves. Like transnational weapons corporations, the massive tech companies, the oil and gas monopolies, and finance capitalists.

This is also why appeals to say "arming israel is against US national interest" will always be a do-nothing political position inside the NATO countries. Because war & genocide is the permanent condition of imperialism and primary method of capital accumulation (see work by Ali Kadri)

this post was submitted on 29 May 2026
136 points (100.0% liked)

World News

40688 readers
515 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS