382

Henry Cuellar, Donald Davis, Cleo Fields, Laura Gillen, Vicente Gonzalez, Marcy Kaptur, Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, and Eugene Vindman

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pmtriste@lemmy.world 71 points 1 day ago

I think they meant to title this "Why these eight lying scumbags need to be primaried to prevent continuing slide into fascism"

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

Unfortunately Cuellar and Gonzalez won their primaries.

Party leadership showed it preferred Cuellar over any progressive, and it's exactly because of votes like this.

[-] WhoIsTheDrizzle@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Cuellar was pardoned by Trump and clearly captured. What the hell is wrong with his district in Texas?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

What the hell is wrong with his district in Texas?

The party demonstrated that it will do whatever it takes to defeat progressive candidates, so they stopped running.

[-] WhoIsTheDrizzle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Wouldn't a democratic voter pick a ham sandwich over someone pardoned by Trump and has voted in line with everything Trump has asked of him since the pardon? Seems like a good opportunity to get a progressive candidate in there.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Wouldn’t a democratic voter pick a ham sandwich over someone pardoned by Trump and has voted in line with everything Trump has asked of him since the pardon?

The last time a progressive ran against him, the party threw everything it had behind Cuellar. This was before trump pardoned him, but after he made it clear that he was an anti-choice anti-labor pro-nra candidate. Cuellar won by something like 500 votes.

Any progressive candidate has to fight against the Democratic party to win the nomination and then if they win anyway, they have to fight the Republican candidate with a depleted war chest and no support from their own party. Or as Mamdani showed, active antagonism from their own party.

[-] WhoIsTheDrizzle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I would have hoped there may have been active antagonism at this point. Cuellar worse than Fetterman or a Republican and squishy brained Dems still voting for him.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

As long as the party backs him up (and since he does everything party leadership wants, they will keep doing so) his district doesn't have anyone with the means to fight two major US political parties.

Not to mention, Cuellar has a documented history of corruption. I'm certain he has no problem abusing his office to kneecap opposition. After all, he's a centrist democrat.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago

Gluesenkamp Perez is almost always on the wrong side of decisions like these. Unfortunately, her district is very mixed and not remotely a Democratic stronghold. A more progressive Democrat would be unlikely to win in her district.

this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
382 points (100.0% liked)

Progressive Politics

4645 readers
748 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS