100
Ngl, leftists fight way too much ๐ญ
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 20 May 2026
100 points (100.0% liked)
Flippanarchy
2489 readers
980 users here now
Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.
Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.
This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.
Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Rules
-
If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
-
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
-
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
-
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
-
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
-
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
-
No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Agree, every literal communist should clown on anarchists more instead
Don't you have some workers to betray or smth? ๐
Don't you have bedtimes to abolish?
Why are you in an anarchist community hosted on an anarchist instance posting from an anarchist instance if you think anarchists need to be clowned on?
Are you being sarcastic or should I be banning you from this comm?
Nah it's a joke, figured it was a really funny thing to say on a post calling for communist unity.
In that case you need to be more clear because it's not coming our as a joke at all, but rather as a violation of the comm's rules.
What rule would that be though? I'm not really seeing it
4 and 6
pretty sure hes serious
Just making sure
I'd prefer we not recreate the Makhno situation
Wait till you hear about anarcho-communists.
Pannekoek already called them "radical liberals" in one of his texts
Well I guess everyone's wrong once in a while ๐